What do coaches orchestrate? Unravelling the ‘quiddity’ of practice

Robyn L. Jones*, Lars Tore Ronglan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The general purpose of this article is threefold. Firstly, it is to further the notion of coaching as orchestration through developing insight into precisely how and what coaches orchestrate. Secondly, it is to firmly position coaching as a relational practice, whilst thirdly it is to better define coaching’s complex nature and how it can be somewhat ordered. Following an introduction where the purpose and value of the article are outlined, we present the reflective method of critical companionship through which we explored and addressed the aforementioned purposes. The case for the quiddity, or the ‘just whatness’ (i.e. the inherent nature or essence) of coaching as involving complex, relational acts which can be somewhat explained through recourse to the developing theory of orchestration is subsequently made. In doing so, two precise examples of how we as coaches orchestrate sporting practice are presented. The article concludes with both a summary of the principal argument(s) made, and some reflective considerations for future directions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)905-915
Number of pages11
JournalSport, Education and Society
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Coaching
  • orchestration
  • quiddity
  • relational practice

Cite this