TY - JOUR
T1 - The capable coach
T2 - reclaiming relationality in coaching
AU - Lane, Andrew P.
AU - Corsby, Charles L.T.
AU - Jones, Robyn L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2026/5/19
Y1 - 2026/5/19
N2 - This study contributes to the developing body of research examining the precarity of professional coaching. As ‘antidotes’ to such vulnerability, concepts such as resilience and coping have been promoted in ego centric ways. In doing so, the coach has been portrayed as an individual who must be self-sufficient, self-determining, and independent; a stance that ignores or excuses the influence of structural workplace conditions. The purpose of the present study was to challenge the salience of such personalised notions and alternatively provide a more nuanced, relational understanding of coaching. The dataset included 20 semi-structured interviews and 260 qualitative survey responses from part- and full-time professional football coaches. The findings, guided by a loose framework of affordances, recast coaches’ everyday practice as inherently interconnected and relationally accomplished. They illustrate how agency (and resilience) is bound to organisational constraints, always embedded within social relations and opportunities. Far from being a self-governing tenacious individual, the contention is made that the ‘capable coach’ is one who constantly navigates how action and influence are enacted through a wider arrangement of workplace relations. Coaches are subsequently presented as contextually sensitive interactants, capable of joint action that requires both individual intentionality and a sensitivity to situational dynamics.
AB - This study contributes to the developing body of research examining the precarity of professional coaching. As ‘antidotes’ to such vulnerability, concepts such as resilience and coping have been promoted in ego centric ways. In doing so, the coach has been portrayed as an individual who must be self-sufficient, self-determining, and independent; a stance that ignores or excuses the influence of structural workplace conditions. The purpose of the present study was to challenge the salience of such personalised notions and alternatively provide a more nuanced, relational understanding of coaching. The dataset included 20 semi-structured interviews and 260 qualitative survey responses from part- and full-time professional football coaches. The findings, guided by a loose framework of affordances, recast coaches’ everyday practice as inherently interconnected and relationally accomplished. They illustrate how agency (and resilience) is bound to organisational constraints, always embedded within social relations and opportunities. Far from being a self-governing tenacious individual, the contention is made that the ‘capable coach’ is one who constantly navigates how action and influence are enacted through a wider arrangement of workplace relations. Coaches are subsequently presented as contextually sensitive interactants, capable of joint action that requires both individual intentionality and a sensitivity to situational dynamics.
KW - agency
KW - precarity
KW - professional football coaching
KW - relational work
KW - relational resilience
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105039585897
U2 - 10.1080/16138171.2026.2671548
DO - 10.1080/16138171.2026.2671548
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105039585897
SN - 1613-8171
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - European Journal for Sport and Society
JF - European Journal for Sport and Society
ER -