TY - JOUR
T1 - Social representation of “hearing loss”
T2 - Cross-cultural exploratory study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK
AU - Manchaiah, Vinaya
AU - Danermark, Berth
AU - Ahmadi, Tayebeh
AU - Tomé, David
AU - Zhao, Fei
AU - Li, Qiang
AU - Krishna, Rajalakshmi
AU - Germundsson, Per
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Manchaiah et al.
PY - 2015/11/19
Y1 - 2015/11/19
N2 - Background: Hearing loss is one of the most common chronic conditions in older adults. In audiology literature, several studies have examined the attitudes and behavior of people with hearing loss; however, not much is known about the manner in which society in general views and perceives hearing loss. This exploratory study was aimed at understanding the social representation of hearing loss (among the general public) in the countries of India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK. We also compared these social representations. Materials and methods: The study involved a cross-sectional design, and participants were recruited using the snowball sampling method. A total of 404 people from four countries participated in the study. Data were collected using a free-association task where participants were asked to produce up to five words or phrases that came to mind while thinking about hearing loss. In addition, they were also asked to indicate if each word they presented had positive, neutral, or negative associations in their view. Data were analyzed using various qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: The most frequently occurring categories were: assessment and management; causes of hearing loss; communication difficulties; disability; hearing ability or disability; hearing instruments; negative mental state; the attitudes of others; and sound and acoustics of the environment. Some categories were reported with similar frequency in most countries (eg, causes of hearing loss, communication difficulties, and negative mental state), whereas others differed among countries. Participants in India reported significantly more positive and fewer negative associations when compared to participants from Iran, Portugal, and the UK. However, there was no statistical difference among neutral responses reported among these countries. Also, more differences were noted among these countries than similarities. Conclusion: These findings provide useful insights into the public perception of hearing loss that may prove useful in public education and counseling.
AB - Background: Hearing loss is one of the most common chronic conditions in older adults. In audiology literature, several studies have examined the attitudes and behavior of people with hearing loss; however, not much is known about the manner in which society in general views and perceives hearing loss. This exploratory study was aimed at understanding the social representation of hearing loss (among the general public) in the countries of India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK. We also compared these social representations. Materials and methods: The study involved a cross-sectional design, and participants were recruited using the snowball sampling method. A total of 404 people from four countries participated in the study. Data were collected using a free-association task where participants were asked to produce up to five words or phrases that came to mind while thinking about hearing loss. In addition, they were also asked to indicate if each word they presented had positive, neutral, or negative associations in their view. Data were analyzed using various qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: The most frequently occurring categories were: assessment and management; causes of hearing loss; communication difficulties; disability; hearing ability or disability; hearing instruments; negative mental state; the attitudes of others; and sound and acoustics of the environment. Some categories were reported with similar frequency in most countries (eg, causes of hearing loss, communication difficulties, and negative mental state), whereas others differed among countries. Participants in India reported significantly more positive and fewer negative associations when compared to participants from Iran, Portugal, and the UK. However, there was no statistical difference among neutral responses reported among these countries. Also, more differences were noted among these countries than similarities. Conclusion: These findings provide useful insights into the public perception of hearing loss that may prove useful in public education and counseling.
KW - Cross-culture
KW - Hearing impairment
KW - Hearing loss
KW - Perception of disability
KW - Social representation
KW - Societal attitude
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947721288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/CIA.S91076
DO - 10.2147/CIA.S91076
M3 - Article
C2 - 26604726
AN - SCOPUS:84947721288
SN - 1176-9092
VL - 10
SP - 1857
EP - 1872
JO - Clinical Interventions in Aging
JF - Clinical Interventions in Aging
ER -