Abstract
Despite previous research suggesting that participants' negative and positive emotions can impair and facilitate reasoning performance, a recent study proposes that the emotional content of the mood induction materials may not be crucial in eliciting these phenomena-deontic selection task performance is as poor when these materials are neutral as when they are negative (Perham and Oaksford 2006). We extend this finding to syllogistic reasoning performance. Participants in the mood induction conditions (negative and neutral) verbally described their experiences in relation to twenty negative or neutral words whereas participants in the control condition received no such mood induction. Subsequent syllogistic reasoning performance was significantly poorer for both mood induction conditions yet only those in the negative mood induction condition showed a significant increase in anxiety. Results imply that the key mechanism involved in the impairment derives from the production of irrelevant thoughts and that these need not be linked to a positive or negative mood, thus "not thinking" may actually help the reasoning process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 160-167 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Current Psychology |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Apr 2012 |
Keywords
- Emotion
- Irrelevant thoughts
- Reasoning