TY - JOUR
T1 - Noise exposure as a risk factor for acoustic neuroma
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Cao, Zuwei
AU - Zhao, Fei
AU - Mulugeta, Helena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society.
PY - 2019/4/23
Y1 - 2019/4/23
N2 - Objective: To investigate whether acoustic neuroma is associated with noise. Design: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using quality-effect models. Study sample: A total of eight studies with moderate or high quality involving 75,571 participants met the inclusion criteria. Results: There was no significant relationship between overall noise exposure and acoustic neuroma (OR:1.02, 95% CI: 0.64–1.63). However, further subgroup analysis showed that leisure noise exposure (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10–2.73), above five years’ exposure (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.14–2.85) and continuous exposure (OR:2.77, 95% CI: 1.70–4.49) were associated with an increased risk of acoustic neuroma. Conclusions: These results suggest an elevated risk of acoustic neuroma among individuals who have been exposed to occupational noise when some subgroup analysis are conducted. Leisure noise in particular seems to play a significant role in the development of acoustic neuroma. However, due to the heterogeneity among the included studies, this conclusion should be interpreted with cautions, even though the continuous long-term consequences should not be ignored.
AB - Objective: To investigate whether acoustic neuroma is associated with noise. Design: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using quality-effect models. Study sample: A total of eight studies with moderate or high quality involving 75,571 participants met the inclusion criteria. Results: There was no significant relationship between overall noise exposure and acoustic neuroma (OR:1.02, 95% CI: 0.64–1.63). However, further subgroup analysis showed that leisure noise exposure (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10–2.73), above five years’ exposure (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.14–2.85) and continuous exposure (OR:2.77, 95% CI: 1.70–4.49) were associated with an increased risk of acoustic neuroma. Conclusions: These results suggest an elevated risk of acoustic neuroma among individuals who have been exposed to occupational noise when some subgroup analysis are conducted. Leisure noise in particular seems to play a significant role in the development of acoustic neuroma. However, due to the heterogeneity among the included studies, this conclusion should be interpreted with cautions, even though the continuous long-term consequences should not be ignored.
KW - Noise exposure
KW - acoustic neuroma
KW - meta-analysis
KW - risk
KW - vestibular Schwannoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064808417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14992027.2019.1602289
DO - 10.1080/14992027.2019.1602289
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31012775
AN - SCOPUS:85064808417
SN - 1499-2027
VL - 58
SP - 525
EP - 532
JO - International Journal of Audiology
JF - International Journal of Audiology
IS - 9
ER -