Abstract

There is much speculation that Actovegin® is ergogenic, but no scientific work has been published in this field. 8 participants [mean( SD) age, height and mass of 24 (7) years, 1.76 (0.07) m and 80.1 (9.1) kg, respectively] completed 3 exhaustive arm crank ergometry tests. Following Baseline testing 2 further tests were performed 2 h following the injection of either 40 ml of Actovegin® or a saline Placebo. Peak power (Wpeak), peak physiological responses, concentrations of blood glucose and lactate, exercise efficiency (%), VOgain (mlW -1), and the respiratory compensation point (RCP) were determined. Repeated measures ANOVA tests were used to analyse data with significance accepted at p0.05. Values of mean (90% CI) bias were calculated to further explore quantitative differences between trials. Strong trends for variations in W(p=0.054) and RCP (p=0.054) were evident; likely meaningful effects existed between the Baseline and both injection trials, but only a trivial effect was noted between Placebo and Actovegin® (bias: W0.83.2 and RCP; 2.54.7 W). Concentrations of blood lactate and glucose changed across time, but did not differ between the 3 trials. Our data suggests the Actovegin® is not ergogenic and did not influence functional capacity in the context of the exhaustive, upper-body test employed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-309
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2012

Keywords

  • arm crank ergometry
  • doping
  • drug injection
  • ergogenic aid
  • haemodialysate

Cite this