TY - JOUR
T1 - Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Cleft Lip and Palate
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Fell, Matthew
AU - Dack, Kyle
AU - Chummun, Shaheel
AU - Sandy, Jonathan
AU - Wren, Yvonne
AU - Lewis, Sarah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.
PY - 2021/9/27
Y1 - 2021/9/27
N2 - Objectives : A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between active maternal smoking and cleft lip and palate etiology. Data sources : Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to November, 2020. Study selection : Observational studies of cigarette smoking habits in pregnant women. Outcomes included cleft lip and/or palate, cleft lip ± palate and cleft palate only. Data analysis : Publication bias analyses were performed and the Newcastle Ottawa scales were used to assess study quality. Fixed or random effect models were used in the meta-analysis, dependent on risk of statistical heterogeneity. Results : Forty-five studies were eligible for inclusion of which 11 were cohort and 34 were case–control studies. Sixteen studies were of sufficient standard for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The summary odds ratio for the association between smoking and cleft lip and/or palate was 1.42 (95%CI 1.27-1.59) with a population attributable fraction of 4% (95%CI 3%-5%). There was limited evidence to show a dose–response effect of smoking. Conclusions : This review reports a moderate association between maternal smoking and orofacial cleft but the overall quality of the conventional observational studies included was poor. There is a need for high quality and novel research strategies to further define the role of smoking in the etiology of cleft lip and palate.
AB - Objectives : A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between active maternal smoking and cleft lip and palate etiology. Data sources : Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to November, 2020. Study selection : Observational studies of cigarette smoking habits in pregnant women. Outcomes included cleft lip and/or palate, cleft lip ± palate and cleft palate only. Data analysis : Publication bias analyses were performed and the Newcastle Ottawa scales were used to assess study quality. Fixed or random effect models were used in the meta-analysis, dependent on risk of statistical heterogeneity. Results : Forty-five studies were eligible for inclusion of which 11 were cohort and 34 were case–control studies. Sixteen studies were of sufficient standard for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The summary odds ratio for the association between smoking and cleft lip and/or palate was 1.42 (95%CI 1.27-1.59) with a population attributable fraction of 4% (95%CI 3%-5%). There was limited evidence to show a dose–response effect of smoking. Conclusions : This review reports a moderate association between maternal smoking and orofacial cleft but the overall quality of the conventional observational studies included was poor. There is a need for high quality and novel research strategies to further define the role of smoking in the etiology of cleft lip and palate.
KW - cleft lip and palate
KW - cleft palate
KW - orofacial cleft
KW - pregnancy
KW - smoking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116025014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10556656211040015
DO - 10.1177/10556656211040015
M3 - Article
C2 - 34569861
AN - SCOPUS:85116025014
SN - 1055-6656
VL - 59
SP - 1185
EP - 1200
JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
IS - 9
ER -