TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge of results during vertical jump testing
T2 - an effective method to increase the performance but not the consistency of vertical jumps
AU - García-Ramos, Amador
AU - Janicijevic, Danica
AU - Cobo-Font, Juande
AU - Marcos-Frutos, Daniel
AU - Fernandes, John F.T.
AU - Taube, Wolfgang
AU - Pérez-Castilla, Alejandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/6/22
Y1 - 2020/6/22
N2 - This study aimed to determine whether the provision of jump height feedback (knowledge of result; KR) can increase the performance and the consistency of output variables. In a randomised order, sixteen participants performed six squat or countermovement jumps (three from a 90º knee angle and three from a self-preferred knee angle) with or without KR over four sessions. The provision of KR significantly increased peak force (p = 0.046, 1.83%), mean force (p = 0.037, 1.45%), peak velocity (p < 0.001, 3.71%), mean velocity (p = 0.004, 3.44%), peak power (p < 0.001, 4.22%) and mean power (p = 0.001, 4.69%). A high within-session reliability was observed for all variables (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤ 5.62%, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.95). No systematic differences in reliability were detected between the jumps performed without KR (CV = 3.00 ± 1.38%, ICC = 0.97 ± 0.03) and with KR (CV = 3.04 ± 1.49%, ICC = 0.97 ± 0.04). These results suggest that the provision of jump height feedback during vertical jump testing is effective to enhance vertical jump performance but it does not reduce the variability between jumps.
AB - This study aimed to determine whether the provision of jump height feedback (knowledge of result; KR) can increase the performance and the consistency of output variables. In a randomised order, sixteen participants performed six squat or countermovement jumps (three from a 90º knee angle and three from a self-preferred knee angle) with or without KR over four sessions. The provision of KR significantly increased peak force (p = 0.046, 1.83%), mean force (p = 0.037, 1.45%), peak velocity (p < 0.001, 3.71%), mean velocity (p = 0.004, 3.44%), peak power (p < 0.001, 4.22%) and mean power (p = 0.001, 4.69%). A high within-session reliability was observed for all variables (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤ 5.62%, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.95). No systematic differences in reliability were detected between the jumps performed without KR (CV = 3.00 ± 1.38%, ICC = 0.97 ± 0.03) and with KR (CV = 3.04 ± 1.49%, ICC = 0.97 ± 0.04). These results suggest that the provision of jump height feedback during vertical jump testing is effective to enhance vertical jump performance but it does not reduce the variability between jumps.
KW - Countermovement jump
KW - force platform
KW - jump height
KW - reliability
KW - squat jump
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087344829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14763141.2020.1764090
DO - 10.1080/14763141.2020.1764090
M3 - Article
C2 - 32564674
AN - SCOPUS:85087344829
SN - 1476-3141
VL - 22
SP - 798
EP - 810
JO - Sports Biomechanics
JF - Sports Biomechanics
IS - 7
ER -