TY - GEN
T1 - Is facilities management fundamental to the conservation of heritage buildings and their contents?
AU - Francis, Trevor J.
AU - Geens, Andrew J.
AU - Littlewood, John
PY - 2010/10/1
Y1 - 2010/10/1
N2 - Many irredeemable cultural objects and artefacts are housed and exhibited within historic buildings and estates of outstanding cultural significance. Frequently, these properties were conceived to serve a very different use than act as permanent depositories for the objects, functions and collections, they now house. Sustained performance of fabric, fixtures/fittings and services is essential, given the perceived demands of: climate-change, perils, increasing user expectations e.g. accessibility, environmental quality and legislative demand. As a consequence the cultural significance of both building and collection are tested. The aim is to establish whether a Facilities Management approach offers a solution to mitigating such risks. This research studied 50 'heritage' buildings and utilized a Condition Survey pro-forma approach, to record and evaluate the management and maintenance of the building and contents. Conflicts of: conservation philosophy, accessibility, environmental monitoring, visual display, curator-ship and guardianship; are tested against established methods of building care. Whilst most heritage sites have been modified, updated and repaired, this has been undertaken in a widely, conflicting manner, displaying varying standards of care and exposing the contents to risk. It is concluded that a pro-active 'Facilities Management' approach has scope for effectively sustaining cultural objects, artefacts and iconic buildings, for the benefit of future generations.
AB - Many irredeemable cultural objects and artefacts are housed and exhibited within historic buildings and estates of outstanding cultural significance. Frequently, these properties were conceived to serve a very different use than act as permanent depositories for the objects, functions and collections, they now house. Sustained performance of fabric, fixtures/fittings and services is essential, given the perceived demands of: climate-change, perils, increasing user expectations e.g. accessibility, environmental quality and legislative demand. As a consequence the cultural significance of both building and collection are tested. The aim is to establish whether a Facilities Management approach offers a solution to mitigating such risks. This research studied 50 'heritage' buildings and utilized a Condition Survey pro-forma approach, to record and evaluate the management and maintenance of the building and contents. Conflicts of: conservation philosophy, accessibility, environmental monitoring, visual display, curator-ship and guardianship; are tested against established methods of building care. Whilst most heritage sites have been modified, updated and repaired, this has been undertaken in a widely, conflicting manner, displaying varying standards of care and exposing the contents to risk. It is concluded that a pro-active 'Facilities Management' approach has scope for effectively sustaining cultural objects, artefacts and iconic buildings, for the benefit of future generations.
KW - Building care
KW - Climate change
KW - Cultural significance
KW - Facilities management
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861081471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84861081471
SN - 0955239044
SN - 9780955239045
T3 - Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010 - Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference
SP - 1507
EP - 1516
BT - Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010 - Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference
T2 - 26th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010
Y2 - 6 September 2010 through 8 September 2010
ER -