Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries

Lew Hardy*, Matthew Barlow, Lynne Evans, Tim Rees, Tim Woodman, Chelsea Warr

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-216
Number of pages10
JournalProgress in Brain Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Athletes
  • Biographies
  • Development
  • Elite
  • Super-elite

Cite this