Defining physical literacy for application in Australia: A modified delphi method

Richard J. Keegan*, Lisa M. Barnett, Dean A. Dudley, Richard D. Telford, David R. Lubans, Anna S. Bryant, William M. Roberts, Philip J. Morgan, Natasha K. Schranz, Juanita R. Weissensteiner, Stewart A. Vella, Jo Salmon, Jenny Ziviani, Anthony D. Okely, Nalda Wainwright, John R. Evans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The development of a physical literacy definition and standards framework suitable for implementation in Australia. Method:Modified Delphi methodology. Results: Consensus was established on four defining statements: Core-Physical literacy is lifelong holistic learning acquired and applied in movement and physical activity contexts; Composition-Physical literacy reflects ongoing changes integrating physical, psychological, cognitive, and social capabilities; Importance-Physical literacy is vital in helping us lead healthy and fulfilling lives through movement and physical activity; and Aspiration-A physically literate person is able to draw on his/her integrated physical, psychological, cognitive, and social capacities to support health promoting and fulfilling movement and physical activity, relative to the situation and context, throughout the lifespan. The standards framework addressed four learning domains (physical, psychological, cognitive, and social), spanning five learning configurations/levels. Conclusion: The development of a bespoke program for a new context has important implications for both existing and future programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-118
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Teaching in Physical Education
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Education
  • Expert
  • Policy
  • Sport

Cite this