Abstract
Restorative services can develop from the bottom-up, as community-led schemes, or from the top-down, as institutionally or organisationally-led programmes. This paper examines the challenges both types of service face, drawing on interviews with practitioners, service commissioners, and academics working across England, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, and Sierra Leone. The findings suggest that restorative projects face significant challenges: bottom-up projects often lack the resources that come with institutional recognition and may struggle to achieve the acceptance and integration into other state services. If they do achieve this integration, they risk alienating the communities from which they emerged. Top-down projects may enjoy greater funding security and have the benefit of institutional acceptance, but often struggle to engage community members because they lack the on-the-ground legitimacy. Overall, we find that both are important; both fill a ‘space’ of need, and both contribute to the continued development and integration of restorative work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100555 |
| Journal | International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice |
| Volume | 71 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Sept 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Community justice
- Criminal justice reform
- Institutional practice
- Restorative justice
- Restorative practice
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver