Authority and judgement in the digital archive

Alan Dix, Rachel Cowgill, Christina Bashford, Simon McVeigh, Rupert Ridgewell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The transformative promise of the digital humanities is not without problems. This paper looks at digital archive curation using a database of 19th-century London concerts as a case study. We examine some of the barriers faced in its development, related to expertise, volume and complexity, the gap between cost and benefit, and the desire for an authoritative and complete dataset that forces a particular linear process of curation. We explore the potential for more radical approaches where curation and use are interleaved, and where digitally maintained provenance allows professional judgement to be applied to incomplete, crowdsourced, or automatically processed data.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - DLfM 2014
Subtitle of host publication1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology, co-located with the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2014 and International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2014
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
ISBN (Electronic)9781450330022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sept 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM 2014 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 12 Sept 2014 → …

Publication series

NameACM International Conference Proceeding Series
Volume12-September-2014

Conference

Conference1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM 2014
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period12/09/14 → …

Keywords

  • Concerts
  • Digital archives
  • Digital humanities
  • Ephemera
  • Linked data
  • Musicology
  • Open data
  • Performance history

Cite this