TY - JOUR
T1 - A service evaluation specifying the active components of a functional restorative programme to promote management of persistent non-specific low back pain
AU - Kennedy, Danica
AU - Thomas, Amy
AU - Hoefkens, Toni
AU - Limbert, Caroline
AU - Seage, Catherine Heidi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/6/17
Y1 - 2021/6/17
N2 - Background: Functional Restorative Programmes (FRP) for persistent non-specific lower back pain have been shown to be effective, but they often lack sufficient detailed reporting of the intervention components to allow for accurate replication. Objectives: This study used the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) (BCTi) [1] to identify the main components of one such programme and interviewed patients to identify the most effective programme components and areas for improvement. Design: A mixed methods design was used. Methods: Intervention data were coded using the BCT Taxonomy (v1) to identify the BCTs utilised. Following this, semi-structured interviews with nine patients evaluated the BCTs included using thematic analysis and identified possible techniques for inclusion in future developments of the programme. Results: Forty-one different BCTs were identified in the coding phase with frequency of occurrence in the programme ranging from forty-nine to one. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: Social Support, Shaping Knowledge, Repetition and Substitution and Changes in Mindset. Conclusion: The results of this study identify the key ingredients in a programme for persistent, non-specific lower back pain, which facilitates the replication of this intervention and identified areas patients appreciated most as well as areas for improvement.
AB - Background: Functional Restorative Programmes (FRP) for persistent non-specific lower back pain have been shown to be effective, but they often lack sufficient detailed reporting of the intervention components to allow for accurate replication. Objectives: This study used the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) (BCTi) [1] to identify the main components of one such programme and interviewed patients to identify the most effective programme components and areas for improvement. Design: A mixed methods design was used. Methods: Intervention data were coded using the BCT Taxonomy (v1) to identify the BCTs utilised. Following this, semi-structured interviews with nine patients evaluated the BCTs included using thematic analysis and identified possible techniques for inclusion in future developments of the programme. Results: Forty-one different BCTs were identified in the coding phase with frequency of occurrence in the programme ranging from forty-nine to one. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: Social Support, Shaping Knowledge, Repetition and Substitution and Changes in Mindset. Conclusion: The results of this study identify the key ingredients in a programme for persistent, non-specific lower back pain, which facilitates the replication of this intervention and identified areas patients appreciated most as well as areas for improvement.
KW - Behaviour change
KW - Combined physical and psychological programme
KW - Functional restoration intervention
KW - Low back pain
KW - Taxonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108084863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102404
DO - 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102404
M3 - Article
C2 - 34147953
AN - SCOPUS:85108084863
SN - 2468-8630
VL - 55
JO - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
JF - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
M1 - 102404
ER -