TY - JOUR
T1 - A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
AU - Broomfield, Katherine
AU - Harrop, Deborah
AU - Jones, Georgina L.
AU - Sage, Karen
AU - Judge, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/8/26
Y1 - 2022/8/26
N2 - Purpose: This paper presents a review of the existing qualitative research literature concerning people’s experience of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The aims of conducting this review were to find out more about the values and outcomes that are important to people about the AAC they use to support their communication. This review was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of these experiences to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Materials and methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis of existing qualitative research literature was undertaken to explore and appraise current knowledge about the experiences of people who use AAC. Results: From 115 qualitative research reports 19 papers were identified that responded directly to the research question and aims of the review. Data were identified that could be organized within an a priori framework consisting of the constructs of values, outcomes, and context. Conclusion: The review has resulted in a deeper, analytical understanding of the experiences of people who require AAC. The results indicate a set of concepts that can be used to inform the development of a PROM. A PROM can be used to assist clinicians and researchers to better understand the perspectives of people who require AAC and evaluate interventions. The results also encourage professionals to reconsider the terminology and methods used when working alongside people who require AAC and to reflect on the multidimensional factors that influence people’s experience of communication.
AB - Purpose: This paper presents a review of the existing qualitative research literature concerning people’s experience of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The aims of conducting this review were to find out more about the values and outcomes that are important to people about the AAC they use to support their communication. This review was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of these experiences to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Materials and methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis of existing qualitative research literature was undertaken to explore and appraise current knowledge about the experiences of people who use AAC. Results: From 115 qualitative research reports 19 papers were identified that responded directly to the research question and aims of the review. Data were identified that could be organized within an a priori framework consisting of the constructs of values, outcomes, and context. Conclusion: The review has resulted in a deeper, analytical understanding of the experiences of people who require AAC. The results indicate a set of concepts that can be used to inform the development of a PROM. A PROM can be used to assist clinicians and researchers to better understand the perspectives of people who require AAC and evaluate interventions. The results also encourage professionals to reconsider the terminology and methods used when working alongside people who require AAC and to reflect on the multidimensional factors that influence people’s experience of communication.
KW - Augmentative and alternative communication
KW - experiences
KW - patient-reported outcome measure
KW - perspectives
KW - qualitative evidence synthesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136880814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961
DO - 10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36026563
AN - SCOPUS:85136880814
SN - 1748-3107
VL - 19
SP - 1802
EP - 1816
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
IS - 5
ER -