TY - JOUR
T1 - A Primer on Repeated Sitting Exposure and the Cardiovascular System
T2 - Considerations for Study Design, Analysis, Interpretation, and Translation
AU - Stoner, Lee
AU - Barone Gibbs, Bethany
AU - Meyer, Michelle L.
AU - Fryer, Simon
AU - Credeur, Daniel
AU - Paterson, Craig
AU - Stone, Keeron
AU - Hanson, Erik D.
AU - Kowalsky, Robert J.
AU - Horiuchi, Masahiro
AU - Mack, Christopher P.
AU - Dave, Gaurav
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Stoner, Barone Gibbs, Meyer, Fryer, Credeur, Paterson, Stone, Hanson, Kowalsky, Horiuchi, Mack and Dave.
PY - 2021/8/17
Y1 - 2021/8/17
N2 - Sedentary behavior, particularly sitting, is ubiquitous in many contemporary societies. This is a major societal concern considering the evidence for a strong association between sitting behavior and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Unsurprisingly, leading public health agencies have begun to advocate “reduction” in sitting behavior. Though, the guidelines are typically vague and non-specific. The lack of specific guidelines for prolonged sitting is attributable to the absence of available evidence to facilitate guideline development. To inform policy, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to test the efficacy of specific and translatable sitting reduction strategies. To guide the design of randomized controlled trials, this review postulates that several gaps in the literature first need to be filled. Following a general discussion of the importance of sitting behavior to contemporary societies, each of the following are discussed: (i) acute sitting exposure and systems physiology; (ii) recommendations for a systems physiology toolbox; (iii) study design considerations for acute sitting exposure; and (iv) translation of sitting-focused research.
AB - Sedentary behavior, particularly sitting, is ubiquitous in many contemporary societies. This is a major societal concern considering the evidence for a strong association between sitting behavior and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Unsurprisingly, leading public health agencies have begun to advocate “reduction” in sitting behavior. Though, the guidelines are typically vague and non-specific. The lack of specific guidelines for prolonged sitting is attributable to the absence of available evidence to facilitate guideline development. To inform policy, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to test the efficacy of specific and translatable sitting reduction strategies. To guide the design of randomized controlled trials, this review postulates that several gaps in the literature first need to be filled. Following a general discussion of the importance of sitting behavior to contemporary societies, each of the following are discussed: (i) acute sitting exposure and systems physiology; (ii) recommendations for a systems physiology toolbox; (iii) study design considerations for acute sitting exposure; and (iv) translation of sitting-focused research.
KW - arterial stiffness
KW - biological plausibility
KW - ecological validity
KW - endothelial function
KW - external validity
KW - internal validity
KW - methodology
KW - sedentary behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121399211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2021.716938
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2021.716938
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85121399211
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 716938
ER -