Abstract
The recent evolution of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) presents a potent combination of the speed of Lean and the robustness of Six Sigma. Literature shows significant application of DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyse-Improve-Control) framework in LSS projects. Many studies suggest that LSS makes a positive contribution towards the effectiveness of organisations. However, a few studies also suggest that organisations find DMAIC projects problematic, and in many cases ineffective. We investigate and resolve this paradox by conceptualising a novel LSS framework, and further test it for practical implications. A four-phase methodology is used. In phase-1, relevant data is pooled from multiple sources including the literature, semi-structured interviews and questionnaire-based survey in the scope of the manufacturing sector. The pooled data is classified and analysed in Phase-2. Phase-3 focused on development of the conceptual framework, and Phase-4 aimed to test the conceptual framework in select manufacturing firms in real-world environment. This study reveals focused gaps and shortcomings of the DMAIC framework for LSS project management. Secondly, we propose a novel approach to LSS project management by conceptualising ‘SDMMAICS’ framework. Thirdly, we validated the conceptual framework in real-world. Finally, the practical implications were discussed to add value to both researchers and practitioners.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 895-907 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Production Planning and Control |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Oct 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Assessment; Lean Six Sigma (LSS)
- DMAIC
- SDMMAICS
- framework
- project management
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver