TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of load-velocity and load-power relationships between well-trained young and middle-aged males during three popular resistance exercises
AU - Fernandes, John F.T.
AU - Lamb, Kevin L.
AU - Twist, Craig
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - This study examined the load-velocity and load-power relationships among 20 young (age 21.0±1.6 years) and 20 middleaged (age 42.6 ± 6.7 years) resistance-trained males. Participants performed 3 repetitions of bench press, squat, and bentover- row across a range of loads corresponding to 20-80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Analysis revealed effects (p < 0.05) of group and load 3 group on barbell velocity for all 3 exercises, and interaction effects on power for squat and bentover- row (p <0.05). For bench press and bent-over-row, the young group produced higher barbell velocities, with the magnitude of the differences decreasing as load increased (ES; effect size 0.0-1.7 and 1.0-2.0, respectively). Squat velocity was higher in the young group than the middle-aged group (ES 1.0-1.7) across all loads, as was power for each exercise (ES 1.0-2.3). For all 3 exercises, both velocity and 1RM were correlated with optimal power in the middle-aged group (r = 0.613-0.825, p <0.05), but only 1RM was correlated with optimal power (r = 0.708-0.867, p <0.05) in the young group. These findings indicate that despite their resistance training, middle-aged males were unable to achieve velocities at low external loads and power outputs as high as the young males across a range of external resistances. Moreover, the strong correlations between 1RM and velocity with optimal power suggest that middle-aged males would benefit from training methods which maximize these adaptations.
AB - This study examined the load-velocity and load-power relationships among 20 young (age 21.0±1.6 years) and 20 middleaged (age 42.6 ± 6.7 years) resistance-trained males. Participants performed 3 repetitions of bench press, squat, and bentover- row across a range of loads corresponding to 20-80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Analysis revealed effects (p < 0.05) of group and load 3 group on barbell velocity for all 3 exercises, and interaction effects on power for squat and bentover- row (p <0.05). For bench press and bent-over-row, the young group produced higher barbell velocities, with the magnitude of the differences decreasing as load increased (ES; effect size 0.0-1.7 and 1.0-2.0, respectively). Squat velocity was higher in the young group than the middle-aged group (ES 1.0-1.7) across all loads, as was power for each exercise (ES 1.0-2.3). For all 3 exercises, both velocity and 1RM were correlated with optimal power in the middle-aged group (r = 0.613-0.825, p <0.05), but only 1RM was correlated with optimal power (r = 0.708-0.867, p <0.05) in the young group. These findings indicate that despite their resistance training, middle-aged males were unable to achieve velocities at low external loads and power outputs as high as the young males across a range of external resistances. Moreover, the strong correlations between 1RM and velocity with optimal power suggest that middle-aged males would benefit from training methods which maximize these adaptations.
KW - ageing
KW - bench press
KW - bent-over-row
KW - dynapenia
KW - sarcopenia
KW - squat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052693102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001986
DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001986
M3 - Article
C2 - 28486338
AN - SCOPUS:85052693102
SN - 1064-8011
VL - 32
SP - 1440
EP - 1447
JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
IS - 5
ER -