β1-blockade increases maximal apnea duration in elite breath-hold divers

Ryan L. Hoiland*, Philip N. Ainslie, Anthony R. Bain, David B. Macleod, Mike Stembridge, Ivan Drvis, Dennis Madden, Otto Barak, Douglas M. Macleod, Zeljko Dujic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We hypothesized that the cardioselective β1-adrenoreceptor antagonist esmolol would improve maximal apnea duration in elite breath-hold divers. In elite national-level divers (n = 9), maximal apneas were performed in a randomized and counterbalanced order while receiving either iv esmolol (150 μg.kg-1.min-1) or volume-matched saline (placebo). During apnea, heart rate (ECG), beat-by-beat blood pressure, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were measured (finger photoplethysmography). Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) was estimated from rate pressure product. Cerebral blood flow through the internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral arteries (VA) was assessed using Duplex ultrasound. Apnea duration improved in the esmolol trial when compared with placebo (356 ± 57 vs. 323 ±61 s, P < 0.01) despite similar end-apnea peripheral oxyhemoglobin saturation (71.8 ± 10.3 vs. 74.9 ± 9.5%, P = 0.10). The HR response to apnea was reduced by esmolol at 10-30% of apnea duration, whereas MAP was unaffected. Esmolol reduced SV (main effect, P < 0.05) and CO (main effect; P < 0.05) and increased TPR (main effect, P < 0.05) throughout apnea. Esmolol also reduced MVO2 throughout apnea (main effect, P < 0.05). Cerebral blood flow through the ICA and VA was unchanged by esmolol at baseline and the last 30 s of apnea; however, global cerebral blood flow was reduced in the esmolol trial at end-apnea (P < 0.05). Our findings demonstrate that, in elite breath-hold divers, apnea breakpoint is improved by β1-blockade, likely owing to an improved total body oxygen sparring through increased centralization of blood volume (∵ TPR) and reduced MVO2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)899-906
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume122
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2017

Cite this