TY - GEN
T1 - Legacy Versus Algebraic Machine Learning
T2 - 2nd International Congress of Electrical and Computer Engineering, ICECENG 2023
AU - Haidar, Imane M.
AU - Sliman, Layth
AU - Damaj, Issam W.
AU - Haidar, Ali M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
PY - 2024/3/19
Y1 - 2024/3/19
N2 - Over the last few decades, researchers have become increasingly interested in machine learning. The field has progressed from classical techniques to neural networks (NNs) and fuzzy neural networks. A novel approach that employs an algebraic model has recently emerged, which enables data conceptualization through generalization and formalization. This parameter-free model has not been shown to suffer from overfitting. This chapter provides an overview of various artificial intelligence methods, including classical methods, fuzzy logic AI, neural networks, continuously constructive neural networks, and neuro-fuzzy networks. The chapter explains the algebraic model in detail and presents it in a simple formal language, rather than using a complex algebraic demonstration. Additionally, the paper compares these approaches qualitatively and quantitatively using the widely used MNIST dataset. This comparison highlights the advantages of the algebraic model over other approaches and illustrates how knowledge propagates through each approach. The research also determines the level of human intervention required.
AB - Over the last few decades, researchers have become increasingly interested in machine learning. The field has progressed from classical techniques to neural networks (NNs) and fuzzy neural networks. A novel approach that employs an algebraic model has recently emerged, which enables data conceptualization through generalization and formalization. This parameter-free model has not been shown to suffer from overfitting. This chapter provides an overview of various artificial intelligence methods, including classical methods, fuzzy logic AI, neural networks, continuously constructive neural networks, and neuro-fuzzy networks. The chapter explains the algebraic model in detail and presents it in a simple formal language, rather than using a complex algebraic demonstration. Additionally, the paper compares these approaches qualitatively and quantitatively using the widely used MNIST dataset. This comparison highlights the advantages of the algebraic model over other approaches and illustrates how knowledge propagates through each approach. The research also determines the level of human intervention required.
KW - Algebraic machine learning
KW - Classical methods
KW - Continuously constructive neural network
KW - Fuzzy AI neuro-fuzzy
KW - Neural network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189518889&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-52760-9_13
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-52760-9_13
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85189518889
SN - 9783031527593
T3 - EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing
SP - 175
EP - 188
BT - 2nd International Congress of Electrical and Computer Engineering
A2 - Seyman, Muhammet Nuri
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Y2 - 22 November 2023 through 25 November 2023
ER -