TY - JOUR
T1 - Contending with vulnerability and uncertainty
T2 - what coaches say about coaching
AU - Corsby, Charles L.T.
AU - Jones, Robyn
AU - Lane, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/3/25
Y1 - 2022/3/25
N2 - In exploring how coaches contend with their professional vulnerability, the purpose of this paper is three-fold. Firstly, to describe the informal rules of coaching that demand the appearance and expression of a certain persona. Secondly, to examine how such rules are tied to a culture of ‘the individual”; and, thirdly, to demonstrate how coaches’ accounts of their work not only reflect, but also ensure such practices. The dataset emanated from 20 individual interviews with professional football coaches. Although taking full consideration of what the coaches actually said, the analysis sought to explore what the explanations were standing on behalf of; what Garfinkel described as an “official (professional) line”. The findings pointed to coaches’ necessity to ‘work hard’, to do things the ‘right way’, whilst limitedly acknowledging any vulnerability associated with the job. Positioned as a ‘greedy institution’, the narrative appeared as a means to contend with the difficulties coaches encountered.
AB - In exploring how coaches contend with their professional vulnerability, the purpose of this paper is three-fold. Firstly, to describe the informal rules of coaching that demand the appearance and expression of a certain persona. Secondly, to examine how such rules are tied to a culture of ‘the individual”; and, thirdly, to demonstrate how coaches’ accounts of their work not only reflect, but also ensure such practices. The dataset emanated from 20 individual interviews with professional football coaches. Although taking full consideration of what the coaches actually said, the analysis sought to explore what the explanations were standing on behalf of; what Garfinkel described as an “official (professional) line”. The findings pointed to coaches’ necessity to ‘work hard’, to do things the ‘right way’, whilst limitedly acknowledging any vulnerability associated with the job. Positioned as a ‘greedy institution’, the narrative appeared as a means to contend with the difficulties coaches encountered.
KW - Coaching
KW - insecurity
KW - precarious work
KW - precarity
KW - presenteeism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127322981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21640629.2022.2057697
DO - 10.1080/21640629.2022.2057697
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127322981
SN - 2164-0629
VL - 12
SP - 323
EP - 342
JO - Sports Coaching Review
JF - Sports Coaching Review
IS - 3
ER -