TY - JOUR
T1 - Building restorative justice services
T2 - Considerations on top-down and bottom-up approaches
AU - Hobson, Jonathan
AU - Payne, Brian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/9/21
Y1 - 2022/9/21
N2 - Restorative services can develop from the bottom-up, as community-led schemes, or from the top-down, as institutionally or organisationally-led programmes. This paper examines the challenges both types of service face, drawing on interviews with practitioners, service commissioners, and academics working across England, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, and Sierra Leone. The findings suggest that restorative projects face significant challenges: bottom-up projects often lack the resources that come with institutional recognition and may struggle to achieve the acceptance and integration into other state services. If they do achieve this integration, they risk alienating the communities from which they emerged. Top-down projects may enjoy greater funding security and have the benefit of institutional acceptance, but often struggle to engage community members because they lack the on-the-ground legitimacy. Overall, we find that both are important; both fill a ‘space’ of need, and both contribute to the continued development and integration of restorative work.
AB - Restorative services can develop from the bottom-up, as community-led schemes, or from the top-down, as institutionally or organisationally-led programmes. This paper examines the challenges both types of service face, drawing on interviews with practitioners, service commissioners, and academics working across England, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, and Sierra Leone. The findings suggest that restorative projects face significant challenges: bottom-up projects often lack the resources that come with institutional recognition and may struggle to achieve the acceptance and integration into other state services. If they do achieve this integration, they risk alienating the communities from which they emerged. Top-down projects may enjoy greater funding security and have the benefit of institutional acceptance, but often struggle to engage community members because they lack the on-the-ground legitimacy. Overall, we find that both are important; both fill a ‘space’ of need, and both contribute to the continued development and integration of restorative work.
KW - Community justice
KW - Criminal justice reform
KW - Institutional practice
KW - Restorative justice
KW - Restorative practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138547588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100555
DO - 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100555
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138547588
SN - 1756-0616
VL - 71
JO - International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
JF - International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
M1 - 100555
ER -